<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signing Servers Down Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slashdev.ca/2010/01/28/signing-servers-down-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slashdev.ca/2010/01/28/signing-servers-down-again/</link>
	<description>Hardware, software, and just general tinkering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Clark-Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.slashdev.ca/2010/01/28/signing-servers-down-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Clark-Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashdev.ca/?p=292#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Yeah signing was down for me when you posted. We were worried the keys were revoked or the like. Nope it was just their signing servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah signing was down for me when you posted. We were worried the keys were revoked or the like. Nope it was just their signing servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: make_j4</title>
		<link>http://www.slashdev.ca/2010/01/28/signing-servers-down-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>make_j4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slashdev.ca/?p=292#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Why must RIM hold on to these relic processes?  Hey RIM, t&#039;s the developers, stupid!  Stop impeding the developers; stop with this absurd online signing process and stop with the slow and inadequate simulator.  Is this news?  No, devs have been shouting their dissatisfaction with this for years with no movement from RIM.  Diminishing returns, folks. Go ahead and keep ignoring it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why must RIM hold on to these relic processes?  Hey RIM, t&#8217;s the developers, stupid!  Stop impeding the developers; stop with this absurd online signing process and stop with the slow and inadequate simulator.  Is this news?  No, devs have been shouting their dissatisfaction with this for years with no movement from RIM.  Diminishing returns, folks. Go ahead and keep ignoring it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

